So, Ron Paul can't reduce the size of the state but Margaret Thatcher could - at least in certain areas. How come?
You claim that no state is not just a theory. Where and when was this experiment carried out?
Now, I didn't listen to all of this because it was much too repetitive but the only alternative you seemed to be suggesting was living free. Well, a lot of that: buying the road, not paying taxes, selling drugs would wind me up in jail. So, I'm not going to do it. But what difference is the rest going to make to the state?
3 comments:
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
So, Ron Paul can't reduce the size of the state but Margaret Thatcher could - at least in certain areas. How come?
You claim that no state is not just a theory. Where and when was this experiment carried out?
Now, I didn't listen to all of this because it was much too repetitive but the only alternative you seemed to be suggesting was living free. Well, a lot of that: buying the road, not paying taxes, selling drugs would wind me up in jail. So, I'm not going to do it. But what difference is the rest going to make to the state?
Well, middle age Iceland or Ireland are good samples of a frer society without State (that doesnt mean without comunities or law)
Post a Comment